Frothingham v. Mellon
|Massachusetts v. Mellon Frothingham
|consolidated cases decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the court rejected the concept of taxpayer standing. — Excerpted from Frothingham v. Mellon on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.Frothingham v. Mellon and Massachusetts v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923), were two|
United States Supreme Court
MASSACHUSETTS v. MELLON FROTHINGHAM
Argued: May 3 and 4, 1923. --- Decided: June 4, 1923
Mr. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., for Mellon and others.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 448-459 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Alexander Lincoln and J. Weston Allen, both of Boston, Mass., for Massachusetts.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 459-475 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Wm. L. Rawls and George Arnold Frick, both of Baltimore, Md., and William H. Lamar and Lucius Q. C. Lamar, both of Washington, D. C., for Frothingham.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 475-478 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.
|This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).|