Carter v. Carter Coal Company Helvering
| Carter v. Carter Coal Company Helvering
United States Supreme Court
CARTER v. CARTER COAL COMPANY HELVERING
Argued: and Submitted March 11, 12, 1936. --- Decided: May 18, 1936
Beneficent aims however great or well directed can never serve in lieu of constitutional power.
[Syllabus from pages 239-254 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Frederick H. Wood and William D. Whitney, both of New York City, and Richard H. Wilmer, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner Carter.
[Argument of Counsel from Pages 256-268 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Charles I. Dawson, of Louisville, Ky., for Tway Coal Co.
Messrs. Stanley F. Reed, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., John Dickinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles H. Weston, F. B. Critchlow, A. H. Feller, Robert L. Stern, and Charles Harwood, all of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from Pages 269-276 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Karl J. Hardy, of Washington, D.C., for respondents Carter Coal co. et al.
Mr. Joseph Selligman, of Louisville, Ky., for respondent Clark.
[Argument of Counsel from Page 277 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.
|This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).|