Bauer & Cie v. O'Donnell

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search


Bauer & Cie v. O'Donnell
by the Supreme Court of the United States
Syllabus
Bauer & Cie. v. O'Donnell, 229 U.S. 1 (1913) was a United States Supreme Court decision involving licensing terms on patented works. — Excerpted from Bauer & Cie. v. O'Donnell on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Court Documents
Opinion of the Court
Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg Wikipedia article

United States Supreme Court

229 U.S. 1

BAUER & CIE  v.  O'DONNELL

 Argued: April 10, 1913. --- Decided: May 26, 1913

Messrs. Edwin J. Prindle and Arthur Wright for Bauer & Cie.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 2-7 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Daniel W. Baker and Frank J. Hogan for O'Donnell.

Mr. Horace Pettit for the Victor Talking Machine Company.

Mr. Nathan Matthews for the Waltham Watch Company.

Messrs. Frederick P. Fish and Thomas W. Pelham for the Gilette Safety Razor Company.

Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).