Beardsley v. Arkansas & L. Railway Company/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
819792Beardsley v. Arkansas & L. Railway Company — Opinion of the CourtMelville Fuller

United States Supreme Court

158 U.S. 123

Beardsley  v.  Arkansas & L. Railway Company


This appeal was perfected as to the Arkansas & Louisiana Railway Company only by the giving of bond as required by statute (Rev. St. §§ 1000, 1012); and while the omission of the bond does not necessarily avoid an appeal, if otherwise properly taken, and in proper cases this court may permit the bond to be supplied, no application for such relief has been made in this case, nor could it properly be accorded after the lapse of nearly four years since the decree. The appeal might, therefore, well be dismissed, because ineffectual as to complainant, Paul F. Beardsley.

But this must be the result on another ground. To the decree, Paul F. Beardsley was party complainant, and John D. Beardsley, the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company, Jay Gould, and the Arkansas & Louisiana Railway Company were parties defendant.

It is settled, for reasons too obvious to need repetition, that in equity causes all parties against whome a joint decree is rendered must join in an appeal, if any be taken; but this appeal was taken by John D. Beardsley alone, and there is nothing in the record to show that his codefendants were applied to and refused to appeal, nor was any order entered by the court, on notice, granting a separate appeal to John D. Beardsley in respect of his own interest. The appeal cannot be sustained. Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U.S. 179, 13 Sup. Ct. 39; Davis v. Trust Co., 152 U.S. 590, 14 Sup. Ct. 693.

Appeal dismissed.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse