Bogardus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Bogardus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1937)
the Supreme Court of the United States

Syllabus

→

Bogardus v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 34 (1937), was a case before the U.S. Supreme Court discussing, under United States tax law, how to distinguish compensation from tax-exempt gifts under §102(a).Warning: template has been deprecated.

889165Bogardus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue — Syllabusthe Supreme Court of the United States

Court Documents

Opinion of the Court

Dissenting Opinion: Brandeis

United States Supreme Court

302 U.S. 34

Bogardus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Argued: Oct. 18, 1937. --- Decided: Nov 8, 1937

Mr. Wm. D. Whitney, of New York City, for petitioner.

Homer S.C.ummings, Attorney General, and Mr. A. F. Prescott, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse

Bogardus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Notes[edit]

Navigation menu

Search