Boston Hydraulic Gold Mining Company v. Eagle Copper Silver Mining Company/Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
Boston Hydraulic Gold Mining Company v. Eagle Copper Silver Mining Company
Argued: October 26, 1885. ---
When this cause was reached on the call of the docket it was submitted by the defendant in error on a printed brief. An assignment of errors was not annexed to or returned with the writ of error, as required by section 997, Rev. St. At the last term the counsel for the plaintiff in error was permitted to withdraw his appearance, and no one has taken his place. No argument has been submitted in behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no errors have been assigned in any form. We therefore affirm the judgment without opening the record.
Notes[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse