Francis v. United Jersey Bank
|Francis v. United Jersey Bank
|Opinion of the Court→|
|Opinion of the Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
87 N.J. 15; 432 A.2d 814
JOHN J. FRANCIS, HUGH P. FRANCIS AND J. RAYMOND BERRY, TRUSTEES OF PRITCHARD & BAIRD INTERMEDIARIES CORP., PRITCHARD & BAIRD, INC., P & B INTERMEDIARIES CORP., AND P & B, INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS v. UNITED JERSEY BANK, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES H. PRITCHARD, LILLIAN P. OVERCASH, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LILLIAN G. PRITCHARD AND LILLIAN P. OVERCASH, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 171 N.J. Super. 34 (1979)
No. A-156 Argued: May 5, 1980, Argued --- Decided: July 1, 1981, Decided
Clive S. Cummis argued the cause for appellants (Sills, Beck, Cummis, Radin & Tischman, attorneys; Thomas J. Demski, of counsel; Thomas J. Demski and Kenneth F. Oettle, on the brief).
Hugh P. Francis argued the cause for respondents (Francis and Berry, attorneys).
For affirmance — Justices Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford, Schreiber, Handler and Pollock. For reversal — none. The opinion of the Court was delivered by Pollock, J.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 206.01 of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "judicial opinions, administrative rulings, legislative enactments, public ordinances, and similar official legal documents."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium II § 206.03 and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.