Gherebi, et al. v. Bush, January 31st 2007

From Wikisource

←Wikisource:Guantanamo

Gherebi, et al. v. Bush, January 31st 2007

Wikified from http://www.pegc.us/archive/In_re_Gitmo/order_RBW_20070131.pdf, on May 16, 2007.

Wikipedia has more on: Gherebi, et al. v. Bush.

Wikipedia has more on: Salim Gherebi.

Wikipedia has more on: Isa Ali Abdulla Almurbati.

Wikipedia has more on: Elham Battayav.

Wikipedia has more on: Bostan Karim.

Wikipedia has more on: Nasrullah (Guantanamo detainee 886).

Wikipedia has more on: Asim Ben Thabit Al-Khalaqi.

Wikipedia has more on: Mohammed Amon.

Wikipedia has more on: Ameen Mohammad Albkri.

Wikipedia has more on: Abdalhadi M. Al-Sopai.

Wikipedia has more on: Kadeer Khandan.

Wikipedia has more on: Issam Hamd Ali Bin Ali Al Jayfi.

Wikipedia has more on: Jabbarow Oybek Jamolivich.

Wikipedia has more on: Amer Mohammon.

Wikipedia has more on: Wasim (Guantanamo detainee 338).

Wikipedia has more on: Majid Khan (Guantanamo detainee 10020).

Wikipedia has more on: Wazir.

Wikipedia has more on: 04-1164.

Wikipedia has more on: 04-1227.

Wikipedia has more on: 05-714.

Wikipedia has more on: 05-883.

Wikipedia has more on: 05-891.

Wikipedia has more on: 05-999.

Wikipedia has more on: 05-1493.

Wikipedia has more on: 05-1639.

Wikipedia has more on: 05-1667.

Wikipedia has more on: 05-1697.

Wikipedia has more on: 05-2104.

Wikipedia has more on: 05-2112.

Wikipedia has more on: 05-2386.

Wikipedia has more on: 06-1675.

Wikipedia has more on: 06-1690.

Wikipedia has more on: 06-1697.

Case 1:04-cv-01164-RBW Document 96 Filed 01/31/2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Salim Gherebi, Petitioner, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No: 04-1164 (RBW)
Isa Ali Abdulla Almurbati, et al., Petitioners, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No. 04-1227 (RBW)
Elham Battayav Petitioner, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No: 05-714 (RBW)
Karim Bostan Petitioner, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al.,	Civil Action No. 05-883 (RBW)
Nasrullah Petitioner, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No. 05-891 (RBW)
Asim Ben Thabit Al-Khalaqi Petitioner, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No. 05-999 (RBW)
Mohammed Amon Petitioner, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No. 05-1493 (RBW)
Ameen Mohammad Albkri, et al., Petitioners, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No. 05-1639 (RBW)
Abdalhadi M. Al-Sopai, et al., Petitioners, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No. 05-1667 (RBW)
Kadeer Khandan Petitioner, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No. 05-1697 (RBW)
Issam Hamid Ali Bin Ali Al Jayfi, et al., Petitioners, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No: 05-2104 (RBW)
Jabbarov Oybek Jamolivich, Petitioner, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No: 05-2112 (RBW)
Amer Mohammon, et al., Petitioners, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No: 05-2386 (RBW)
Wasim, et al., Petitioners, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No: 06-1675 (RBW)
Majid Khan, et al., Petitioners, v. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No: 06-1690 (RBW)
Haji Wazir, et al., Petitioners, v. DONALD RUMSFELD, et al., Respondents.	Civil Action No: 06-1697 (RBW)

ORDER

On October 17, 2006, Congress enacted the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (“MCA”), Pub. L. No. 109-366, § 7, 120 Stat. 2600, 2636-37 (2006), which, inter alia, amends 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) in a manner that raises serious questions concerning whether this Court retains jurisdiction to hear the above-captioned cases. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(e). These questions are currently pending resolution in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Until the District of Columbia Circuit resolves the jurisdictional questions raised by the MCA, it is this Court’s view that it lacks the authority to take any action in these cases. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that all pending motions in the above-captioned cases are hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE until such time as the District of Columbia Circuit resolves the question of this Court’s jurisdiction to adjudicate these cases.^[1] It is further

ORDERED that the above-captioned cases are ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. In the event that the District of Columbia Circuit concludes that this Court retains some degree of jurisdiction over any or all of the above-captioned cases, the matters will be automatically reopened as appropriate.

SO ORDERED this 31st day of January, 2007.

Reggie B. Walton

United States District Judge

1. ↑ If the District of Columbia Circuit concludes that this Court retains jurisdiction over these cases, either 1 party may move to reinstate the pending motions.