Graham v. Goodcell Oak Worsted Mills

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Graham v. Goodcell Oak Worsted Mills
by Charles Evans Hughes
Syllabus
880447Graham v. Goodcell Oak Worsted Mills — SyllabusCharles Evans Hughes
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

282 U.S. 409

Graham  v.  Goodcell Oak Worsted Mills

 Argued: Dec. 8-11, 1930. --- Decided: Jan 26, 1931

No. 36:

[Syllabus from pages 409-412 intentionally omitted]

Mr. John E. Hughes, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioners.

The Attorney General and Mr. G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

No. 104: Mr. Theodore B. Benson and William Meyerhoff, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

The Attorney General, and Mr. Chas. B. Rugg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.

No. 105:

Messrs. Theodore B. Benson and Guil Barber, both of Washington, D. C., Chester F. Williams, of Milford, Mass., William Meyerhoff and Percy A. Matthews, both of Washington, D. C., Frederick G. Fischer, of New York City, and Frank J. Albus, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

The Attorney General, and Messrs. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., Chas. B. Rugg, Asst. Atty. Gen., Claude R. Branch, of Providence, R. I., George H. Foster and Erwin N. Griswold, both of Washington, D. C., and Bradley B. Gilman, of Worcester, Mass., for the United States.

No. 323:

Mr. W. A. Sutherland, of Fresno, Cal., for petitioner.

The Attorney General and Mr. Chas. B. Rugg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.

No. 337:

Mr. Harry Friedman, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

The Attorney General and Mr. Chas. B. Rugg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.

No. 463:

Messrs. Elkan Turk and Herman Goldman, both of New York City, for petitioner.

Mr. G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

No. 529:

Messrs. Ewing Everett, of New York City, and Robert N. Miller and J. Robert Sherrod, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

The Attorney General, and Messrs. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., Claude R. Branch, of Providence, R. I., and Norman D. Keller, John MacC. Hudson, and Erwin N. Griswold, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

No. 565:

Messrs. Donald V. Hunter and Robert N. Miller, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

The Attorney General and Mr. G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

No. 519:

Mr. Robert E. Goodwin, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.

Mr. G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.

Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse