Hague v. CIO

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search


Court Documents
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion
Hughes
Dissenting Opinions
McReynolds
Butler
Separate Opinion
Stone
Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg Wikipedia article

United States Supreme Court

307 U.S. 496

HAGUE  v.  CIO

 Argued: Feb. 27, 28, 1939. --- Decided: June 5, 1939

[Syllabus from pages 496-500 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Charles Hershenstein, Edward J. O'Mara, and James A. Hamill, all of Jersey City, N.J., for petitioners.

Messrs. Morris L. Ernst. of New York City, and Spaulding Frazer, of Newark, N.J., for respondents.

Mr. Justice BUTLER:

The judgment of the court in this case is that the decree is modified and as modified affirmed. Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER and Mr. Justice DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Mr. Justice ROBERTS has an opinion in which Mr. Justice BLACK concurs, and Mr. Justice STONE an opinion in which Mr. Justice REED concurs. The CHIEF JUSTICE concurs in an opinion. Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS and Mr. Justice BUTLER dissent for reasons stated in opinions by them respectively.

Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered an opinion in which Mr. Justice BLACK concurred.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).