Haley v. Talcott

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
946766Haley v. Talcott — Syllabusthe Delaware Court of Chancery

Court Documents
Opinion of the Court

COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE

864 A.2d 86

MATTHEW JAMES HALEY, Plaintiff,  v.  GREGORY L. TALCOTT, and MATT & GREG REAL ESTATE, LLC, Defendants.

No. 098-S  Argued: October 28, 2004, Submitted --- Decided: December 16, 2004, Decided

Attorney for Plaintiff: John A. Sergovic, Jr., Esquire, SERGOVIC & ELLIS, P.A., Georgetown, Delaware.

Attorneys for Defendants: James D. Griffin, Esquire, and Alix K. Robinson, Esquire, GRIFFIN & HACKETT, P.A., Georgetown, Delaware.

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."

These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).

A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse