Horne v. George H. Hammond Company/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
818659Horne v. George H. Hammond Company — Opinion of the CourtMelville Fuller

United States Supreme Court

155 U.S. 393

Horne  v.  George H. Hammond Company


The title of this cause describes plaintiff in error as 'of Chelsea, in said district,' and the decedent as 'late of Chelsea,' and the defendant as 'a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Michigan.' The writ and the original declaration do not appear in the record. The amended declaration commences thus: 'Plaintiff says that she is the widow of the late Granville P. Horne, of Chelsea, Suffolk county, commonwealth of Massachusetts, and that she was duly appointed by the probate court of Suffolk county administratrix of his estate.'

As the transcript of the record does not show that the circuit court had jurisdiction of the suit, which depended upon the citizenship of the parties, and counsel, upon having their attention called to the matter, have furnished nothing of record which would supply the defect, the judgment must be reversed, at the costs of plaintiff in error, and the cause be remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. Robertson v. Cease, 97 U.S. 646, 649; Anderson v. Watt, 138 U.S. 694, 702, 11 Sup. Ct. 449; Timmons v. Land Co., 139 U.S. 378, 11 Sup. Ct. 585; Denny v. Pironi, 141 U.S. 121, 11 Sup. Ct. 966.

Ordered accordingly.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse