Is Mars habitable?
|Is Mars habitable? A critical examination of Professor Percival Lowell's book "Mars and its canals," with an alternative explanation (1907)
|Front and end matter→|
|OCLC 2661357all editions 1907 rebuttal to Mars and its Canals|
Lowell's Map of Mars, at the opposition of 1903, showing Solis Lacus near the Top.
(From "Nature,", Oct. 11th, 1906)
Is Mars Habitable?
A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF PROFESSOR PERCIVAL LOWELL'S BOOK "MARS AND ITS CANALS," WITH AN ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION
AUTHOR OF "DARWINISM," "MAN'S PLACE IN THE UNIVERSE," ETC.
MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED
ST. MARTIN'S STREET, LONDON
GLASGOW: PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS
BY ROBERT MACLKHOSE AND CO. LTD.
This small volume was commenced as a review article on Professor Percival Lowell's book, Mars and its Canals with the object of showing that the large amount of new and interesting facts contained in this work did not invalidate the conclusion I had reached in 1902, and stated in my book on Man's Place in the Universe that Mars was not habitable.
But the more complete presentation of the opposite view in the volume now under discussion required a more detailed examination of the various physical problems involved, and as the subject is one of great, popular, as well as scientific interest, I determined to undertake the task.
This was rendered the more necessary by the fact that in July last Professor Lowell published in the Philosophical Magazine an elaborate mathematical article claiming to demonstrate that, notwithstanding its much greater distance from the sun and its excessively thin atmosphere, Mars possessed a climate on the average equal to that of the south of England, and in its polar and sub-polar regions even less severe than that of the earth. Such a contention of course required to be dealt with, and led me to collect information bearing upon temperature in all its aspects, and so enlarging my criticism that I saw it would be necessary to issue it in book form.
Two of my mathematical friends have pointed out the chief omission which vitiates Professor Lowell's mathematical conclusions—that of a failure to recognise the very large conservative and cumulative effect of a dense atmosphere. This very point however I had already myself discussed in Chapter VI., and by means of some remarkable researches on the heat of the moon and an investigation of the causes of its very low temperature, I have, I think, demonstrated the incorrectness of Mr. Lowell's results. In my last chapter, in which I briefly summarise the whole argument, I have further strengthened the case for very severe cold in Mars, by adducing the rapid lowering of temperature universally caused by diminution of atmospheric pressure, as manifested in the well-known phenomenon of temperate climates at moderate heights even close to the equator, cold climates at greater heights even on extensive plateaux, culminating in arctic climates and perpetual snow at heights where the air is still far denser than it is on the surface of Mars. This argument itself is, in my opinion, conclusive; but it is enforced by two others equally complete, neither of which is adequately met by Mr. Lowell.
The careful examination which I have been led to give to the whole of the phenomena which Mars presents, and especially to the discoveries of Mr. Lowell, has led me to what I hope will be considered a satisfactory physical explanation of them. This explanation, which occupies the whole of my seventh chapter, is founded upon a special mode of origin for Mars, derived from the Meteoritic Hypothesis, now very widely adopted by astronomers and physicists. Then, by a comparison with certain well-known and widely spread geological phenomena, I show how the great features of Mars—the 'canals' and 'oases'—may have been caused. This chapter will perhaps be the most interesting to the general reader, as furnishing a quite natural explanation of features of the planet which have been termed 'non-natural' by Mr. Lowell.
Incidentally, also, I have been led to an explanation of the highly volcanic nature of the moon's surface. This seems to me absolutely to require some such origin as Sir George Darwin has given it, and thus furnishes corroborative proof of the accuracy of the hypothesis that our moon has had an unique origin among the known satellites, in having been thrown off from the earth itself.
I am indebted to Professor J. H. Poynting, of the University of Birmingham, for valuable suggestions on some of the more difficult points of mathematical physics here discussed, and also for the critical note (at the end of Chapter V.) on Professor Lowell's estimate of the temperature of Mars.
- Broadstone, Dorset,
- October 1907.
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
- Mars the only planet the surface of which is distinctly visible — Early observation of the snow-caps and seas — The 'canals' seen by Schiaparelli in 1877 — Double canals first seen in 1881 — Round spots at intersection of canals seen by Pickering in 1892 — Confirmed by Lowell in 1894 — Changes of colour seen in 1892 and 1894 — Existence of seas doubted by Pickering and Barnard in 1894.
- Observatory at Flagstaff, Arizona — Illustrated book on his observations of Mars — Volume on Mars and its canals, 1906 — Non-natural features — The canals as irrigation works of an intelligent race — A challenge to the thinking world — The canals as described and mapped by Mr. Lowell — The double canals — Dimensions of the canals — They cross the supposed seas — Circular black spots termed oases — An interesting volume.
- No permanent water on Mars — Rarely any clouds and no rain — Snow-caps the only source of water — No mountains, hills, or valleys on Mars — Two-thirds of the surface a desert — Water from the snow-caps too scanty to supply the canals — Miss Clerke's views as to the water-supply — Description of some of the chief canals — Mr. Lowell on the purpose of the canals — Remarks on the same — Mr. Lowell on relation of canals to oases and snow-caps — Critical remarks on the same.
- Water and air essential for animal life — Atmosphere of Mars assumed to be like ours — Blue tint near melting snow the only evidence of water — Fallacy of this argument — Dr. Johnstone Stoney's proof that water-vapour cannot exist on Mars — Spectroscope gives no evidence of water.
- Problem of terrestrial temperature — Ice under recent lava — Tropical oceans ice-cold at bottom — Earth's surface-heat all from the sun — Absolute zero of temperature — Complex problem of planetary temperatures — Mr. Lowell's investigation of the problem — Abstract of Mr. Lowell's paper — Critical remarks on Mr. Lowell's paper.
- Langley's determination of lunar heat — Rapid loss of heat by radiation on the earth — Rapid loss of heat on moon daring eclipse — Sir George Darwin's theory of the moon's origin — Very's researches on the moon's temperature — Application of these results to the case of Mars — Cause of great difference of temperatures of earth and moon — Special features of Mars influencing its temperature — Further criticism of Mr. Lowell's article — Very low temperature of arctic regions on Mars.
- Special features of the canals — Mr. Pickering's suggested explanation — The meteoritic hypotheses of origin of planets — Probable mode of origin of Mars — Structural straight lines on the earth — Probable origin of the surface-features of Mars — Symmetry of basaltic columns — How this applies to Mars — Suggested explanation of the oases — Probable function of the great fissures — Suggested origin of blue patches adjacent to snow-caps — The double canals — Concluding remarks on the canals.
- The canals the origin of Mr. Lowell's theory — Best explained as natural features — Evaporation difficulty not met by Mr. Lowell — How did Martians live without the canals — Radiation due to scanty atmosphere not taken account of — Three independent proofs of low temperature and uninhabitability of Mars — Conclusion.
|This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1923.
The author died in 1913, so this work is also in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 99 years or less. This work may also be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.