Klang v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE
702 A.2d 150
LARRY F. KLANG, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. SMITH'S FOOD & DRUG CENTERS, INC., JEFFREY P. SMITH, RICHARD D. SMITH, FRED L. SMITH, SEAN D. SMITH, ROBERT D. BOLINDER, KENNETH A. WHITE, DOUGLAS JOHN TIGERT, STUART ROSENTHAL, RAY V. ROSE, DUANE PETERS, NICOLE MILLER, ALLEN P. MARTINDALE, DELONNE ANDERSON, THE YUCAIPA COMPANIES, RONALD BURKLE, SMITTY'S SUPERMARKETS, INC., AND CACTUS ACQUISITION, INC., Defendants Below, Appellees.
No. 210 Argued: September 11, 1997 --- Decided: November 7, 1997
William Prickett, Esquire, and Ronald A. Brown, Jr., Esquire (argued), of Prickett, Jones, Elliott, Kristol & Schnee, Wilmington, Delaware; A. B. Conant, Jr., Esquire, and Raymond P. Harris, Jr., Esquire, Of Counsel, of Conant, Whittenburg, French & Schachter, P.C., Dallas, Texas, for Appellant.
Jesse A. Finkelstein, Esquire, of Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Delaware; Bruce D. Angiolillo, Esquire (argued), Jeffrey E. Ostrow, Esquire, and Harrison J. Frahn IV, Esquire, Of Counsel, of Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, New York, New York; and Hugh Steven Wilson, Esquire, and James W. Baker, Esquire, Of Counsel, of Latham & Watkins, San Diego, California, for Appellees.
Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH, HOLLAND, HARTNETT and BERGER, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse