Lake Superior Consol Iron Mines v. Lord

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Lake Superior Consol Iron Mines v. Lord
by James Clark McReynolds
Syllabus
874117Lake Superior Consol Iron Mines v. Lord — SyllabusJames Clark McReynolds
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

271 U.S. 577

Lake Superior Consol Iron Mines  v.  Lord

BURROWS et al.

v.

SAME.

No. 355.

ROYAL MINERAL ASS'N et al.

v.

SAME.

No. 388.

BOEING et al.

v.

SAME.

No. 389.

WHITESIDE et al.

v.

SAME.

No. 390.

MERRIMAC MINING CO.

v.

SAME.

No. 391.

BARDWELL et al.

v.

SARGENT LAND CO. et al.

No. 471.

Argued Dec. 8 and 9, 1925.

Decided June 7, 1926.

Messrs. Charles E. Hughes, of New York City, John W. Beaumont, of Detroit, Mich., and George W. Weadock, of Saginaw, Mich., for appellants in No. 355.

Messrs. Wm. D. Bailey, Oscar Mitchell, and Albert C. Gillette, all of Duluth, Minn., for appellants in Nos. 388 and 389.

Messrs. William D. Bailey and James W. Hunt, both of Duluth, Minn., for appellants in No. 390.

Messrs. John G. Milburn, of New York City, and J. R. Van Derlip, of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellants in No. 471.

Messrs. N. L. Miller and George W. Morgan, both of New York City, for appellants in No. 336.

Messrs. Patrick J. Ryan, G. A. Youngquist, and Clifford L. Hilton, all of St. Paul, Minn., for appellees.

Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse