Lumberman's National Bank of Williamsport v. Huston/Opinion of the Court
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
May 10, 1897.
The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined in Bank v. Nebecker (just decided) 17 Sup. Ct. 766. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice WHITE concurs in the result.
J. J. Crawford, for plaintiff in error.
Sol. Gen. Conrad, for defendant in error.
Notes[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse