Moore v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (402 U.S. 47)

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Moore v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (402 U.S. 47)
Syllabus
942613Moore v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (402 U.S. 47) — Syllabus

United States Supreme Court

402 U.S. 47

Moore et al.  v.  Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education et al.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina

No. 444.  Argued: October 13, 1970 --- Decided: April 20, 1971

Since both parties in this action challenging a school desegregation plan seek the same result, viz., a holding that North Carolina's Anti-Busing Law is constitutional, there is no Art. III case or controversy. Additionally, on the facts of this case, no direct appeal to this Court lies under 28 U.S.C. § 1253.

312 F. Supp. 503, appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Whiteford S. Blakeney argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was William H. Booe.

William J. Waggoner argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief was Benjamin S. Horack.

Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Leonard filed a brief for the United States as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse