Page:A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Judges.djvu/38
xxviii
INTRODUCTION
this element (E2) approach the standpoint of the latter authors that it is difficult, if not impossible, to decide whether certain passages or verses should be attributed to the one or the other.[1] Fortunately, the similarity which makes the analysis uncertain makes it also of less importance. The author of the later element in E (E2) may have lived toward the end of the 8th century or in the first half of the 7th.[2]
The Triumphal Ode, ch. 5, is much older than the corresponding prose narrative, or than any other of the stories in the book.[3] Whether it was included in J, or in E, or in both of them, cannot be certainly determined. The closing formula, 531b, may have been added or transposed by an editor. The Ode was in all probability preserved in one of the collections of old Hebrew poetry, such as the Book of Jashar, or the Book of the Wars of Yahweh;[4] but, like other poems from those collections, may early have been incorporated into the prose histories.
- ↑ It is not impossible, for example, that in the introduction (26–36) a part of what, with Budde, I have ascribed to E, is in reality the work of Rje.
- ↑ It is worthy of notice that the "commandments of Yahweh" are mentioned only in 217 34; "the covenant of Yahweh," only in 21, 20 (Kö., Einl., p. 257).
- ↑ See p. 127–132.
- ↑ Compare 51 with Ex. 151.
- ↑ See p. 270 f.
- ↑ Nöldeke and many recent scholars.