her little ones, born or unborn, she spends in the factory, at the washboard or sewing machine.
Is that natural? If nature favored such a state of affairs, nature would be illogical, and who dare assert so monstrous a thing?
In the state of tetragamy, man has to bear but one-half of the household's expenses. This gives him a chance to save money and to do something for his education, while the children, being supported by two men, have better clothes, better food, more love, and a better home.
Tetragamy would make for morality, because it would make it easier for men to get married. It would make for morality because woman, having two husbands, would not be longing for an affinity. And when old, she would not suffer from the thought, or from the actual knowledge, that her husband betrays her.
Things are different to-day. The man who marries young sees the fire of love extinguished in the woman at his side after a certain number of years.
As to the average woman, in the state of monogamy, she is only too often compelled to marry a man physically inferior to her. If she escapes that fate, then, in the course of time, she must needs come to the conclusion that she is too old for her husband.
But I am not unaware that there are serious objections.
84
