674 COPYRIGHT
1909 Glaser v. St. Elmo U. S. C. C. J. Holt, 175 F. R. 276
Co.
Title of novel, out of copyright, not protectable in drama, 192 1909 Green v. Luby U. S. C. C. J. Noyes, 177 F. R. 287
Error in classification does not invalidate copyright, 136
1909 Harper v. Kalem U. S. C. C. App. J. Ward, 169 F. R. 61
Moving pictures may infringe book copyright, 176, 242 ; both speech and action not necessaty in dramatic performances, 176; illustrations as such do not infringe book copyright, 237
1909 Heinemannji. Smart Chancery J. Parker, Times, Jl. 15, '09
Set Pub. Co.
Innocent publisher responsible for acts beyond authority given to Uterary agent, 437
1909 Hervieu v. Ogilvie U. S. C. C. J. Martin, 169 F. R. 978
Printed drama not subject to manufacturing provisions as "book," ISS. 168
1909 Hunter ». Clifford West. Co. Ct. J. Lush, TmexN.iz. '09
Bight to copyright lapsed on work of art sold without registra- tion, 247
1909 Kamo V. Path6 Ct. App. L. J. Vaughan 100 L. T. 260
FrSres Williams,
Exhibitor, not manufacturer of film, responsible party, 177
1909 Saake ». Lederer U. S. C. C. App. J. Buffington, 174F. R. 135 License to perform does not imply authority to copyright, 107
1909 Scholz V. Amasis Ct. App. L. C. J. Farwell, Times My. 19,
'09 Only substantial copying of written dialogue infringes drama in England, 176
1910 Dam V. Kirke La U. S. C. C. App. J. Noyes, 175 F. R. 902
Shelle Co.
Following decision in lower court 1910 De Jonge v. Breuk- U. S. C. C. J. McPherson, 182 F. R. 150 er & Kessler
Artistic designs for cover paper copyrightable, 237; separable designs must have separate copyright notices, 242; subject cannot be protected both under copyright and trade-mark acts, 237 1910 Eliot & Collier v. N. Y. Sup. Ct. J. Newburger, 120 N. Y
Jones, et al. Supp. 989
Use of "Dr. Eliot's five-foot shelf" prohibited as involving de- ception, 8s 1910 Ellis V. Hurst N. Y. Sup. Ct. J. Greenbaum, 128 N. Y.
Supp. 144 Use of an author's real name on pseudonymous non-copyright works not restrainable, 98
