I. Whether it confro frace ?60, ?Jl Whether it impresaes a chemcter ?Jl sl of its nec?_--? ? VIII. it, ce,'emmt? 761 I. Not ?uppo? ? Act, viii, ?7 ? J. Nor appointed b? Christ ?, ? 2. The operations of the Spirit not confined to it 4. Abmudity of the cemmeniee ? I. The American Catech;-m quoted 934 ?. C?nc? of ?nt ? S. ? ? C? quot? 4. A?y? of it ?, ? 5. A?y ? t? ?o 1. h ? ? ?dh?,h ?ene? nor m ?e wo? ? ? . ?rfr. ?e? M?e of ?e w? suppooee - thin? impomible and contrudictory ?M0, 6. h is a 'dmtinguid? article of their church P, ff4, 7. It is impious and blasphemous in itoelf, nnd tends to impiety, bin* phemy, and 8upei?tition (1.) It involv'e? eating hn?n (2.) And of eating the Divinity (2.) TI? consi&red profane, even by heatheus (&') An? by Mohemmedanm ? (5.) ? by,Jews (?.) The fathers ridicule the ? then for wor?ppi? ?uch de? ties as can be eaten ? ? (7.) Anecdote of a lady and a 1. They say, that "pFevious to the instituti?, tmmd had never been taken as a ?n of our Lord's bod?" 8. The sixth chapter of John comi. dered Thirteen ar?mento agahst their exlx?ition ?59-?62 The proper exposition ?62-?64 3. Their argument from the secret discipline of the early church ?64, 76? 4. And from the language of the cient liturgisa, and the early eccle- �iutical writere 6. Tbey say their doctrine is no mo?e m. ysterim? than that of the Tri- mt?our Point? of ?,65, ?66 difference traced between the two doctfinee ?66, ?67 6. ?They say it b a mystery ?67 7. Thet God cen do all t!?n? 8. That it b a speculative point ?67, ?68 Iv. T? ?,.my of ? /o.?, 76s 1..Eight prembes introducuny their testimony ?,68, ?69 2. Their te?timouy ?69 t (1.) Ignatius ?69, 270 (2.) lren?us (3.) Tertullian (4.) Justin Mm?r 970 (5.) Or?en (6.) Clemens Al?s (7.) Cyprian (8.) Eusebius (9.) Ephrem, lmtrim?h of Con- etantinopie 971, (t0.) Macarius (11.) Ausuetine (12.) ? of Jerusalem (13.) Jerome (14.) Grognr? N?awn (1�Ambroea (16.) Chryso?tom (17.) Theodorot (18.) Oelsaiue (19.) Factmdus 3. Concluding romerk ou their testi- mouy V. R?e, ivro?'?, muf them gave occasion to originate it 974 Specimens fr?n Justin Martyr, end Cyril of Jermmlem 974, S. But it samas to have t?ken its rise kom the EutycMan heresy S. Sentiment of the seventh gertend council in 764 976 ? 4. Pro?n?_ in the ? century Cadrelic authors Puchuius ?66-260 8terc?
�
