Page:EPIC Oxford report.pdf/24

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.

in the 'Additional Information (from links)' section in the order that they appeared in the primary article under sub-sections named after the title of the link and formatted as per the instructions mentioned in article text above. This procedure was not carried out for Wikipedia articles.

Step 3: Anonymisation Process

All articles then underwent a process of anonymisation to remove visible cues as to the source of the article. This included the following steps:

  1. Wikipedia articles were read by the researchers to identify potential acts of vandalism as mentioned in Step 1.
  2. Conversion to a standardised basic text format as mentioned in Step 2.
  3. Removal of cues:
    1. Certain characteristics cues such as the article tree in a Wikipedia entry, content warning (such as the 'article has multiple issues' box at the top of a Wikipedia entry), calls for donations, etc. were removed.
    2. Block quotes in Wikipedia entries were formatted from italics to regular text in Arial font (Colour: black, Font Size: 10).
  4. In text, references were maintained but hyperlinks, author names and affiliations were removed. The removal of authors' names was clearly essential in order to avoid making the origin of a particular obvious to reviewer, as indeed was the removal of the article tree from Wikipedia articles, because this information gave clear indications of the identity of encyclopaedias.
  5. All 'See Also', 'Related Articles', 'External links', links to user ratings [Wikipedia], and 'links', 'related articles', 'share', 'like', 'get involved' features [Britannica], were removed. An example of an article, standardised and anonymised according to this process and ready for review, is presented in Appendix I (6).

3.4.3 Development of the Online Review Tool

The articles and the article feedback questionnaires were uploaded onto an online review tool created using a Moodle. Moodle (www.moodle.org) is a Course Management System, also known as a Learning Management System or a Virtual Learning Environment. It is a free open source web application that educators can use to create effective online learning sites.

The objective of the online review tool was to:

  1. provide an online platform for the experts to view, read and rate the pairs of articles accurately and easily and to make the review an enjoyable experience
  2. facilitate easy collection of both quantitative and qualitative data for the purpose of data analysis

24