OASES BEPOSTES. ���TU ���Page �Long, United States v 879 �Lord Olive, The 135 �Lord, Harvey V 236 �Lovell, Schneider v 666 �Macdonald v. Shepard 919 �Madducli, Stockton v 132 �Manhattan Ry. Co., Flagg v 413 �Marble, Hardy v 752 �Marder, Bruce V 750 �Marion v. Ellis 410 �Marion County v. Mcintyre 643 �Mary Stewart, The 137 �Mason v. Hartford, P. & P. R. Co. . . 334 �Matthews v. Puffler 606 �Matthews, Platt v 280 �Matthews, Tuf ts V 609 �Maury <fc Co. v. Oulliford & Clark.. 388 Mayor, etc.. of the City of New �York, The, Miller V 513 �McCall V. Town of Hancock 8 �McCracken, Liegeois v 664 �Mcintyre v. Thompson . . ■• 631 �Mcintyre, Marion County v 643 �McKay v. Irvine 725 �Meighen v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. �R 529 �Memphis & L. R. R. Co., Overton v. 866 Memphis & L. R. R. Co., Southern �Express Co. v 210 �Memphis & St. L. Packet Co. v. The �H. C. Yaeger Transp, Co 395 �Mengis v. Lebanon Manuf 'g Co 665 �Mercantile Trust Co. v. Portland & �O. R. Co 604 �Meyer, Fisher v 268 �Meyer, Ullman v 241 �Meyrose, Adams v 671 �Miles, Cuykendall v 342 �Miller v. The Mayor, etc., of the City �of New York 613 �Miller, Gottfried v 471 �Minneapolis & St. L. Ry. Co., Gra- �velle V 711 �Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Texas �& St. L. Ry. Co 497 �Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co., Dins- �more v 210 �Moch V. Virginia Pire & Marine Ins. �Co 696, 710 �Moore v. O'Fallon 593 �Mora V. Nunez 634 �Mullan, United States v 785 �New Orleans Nat. Banking Ass'n v. P. S. AViitz&Co 330 �New Process Fermentation Co. v. Baltz 289 �New York Grape Sugar Co. v. Amer- ican Grape Suear Oo 836 �New York Silk Manuf 'g Co. v. Sec- ond Nat. Bank of Paterson 204 �Northern Assurance Co., Waller v. . 232 ���Page Northwestern Masonlo Aid Ass'n, �Worley v 227 �Nunez, Mora v 634 �Odcneal, United States v 616 �O'Fallon, Moore V 693 �Olmstead Bros. , Hammond v 223 �Olney v. Tanner 101 �Osgood V. Artt 365 �Ousatonic Water Co. , Jacobs v 826 �Overton v. Memphis & L. R. R. Co. . 866 �Paddock v. Pish 125 �Paul Revere, The 166 �People of the State of New York v. Compagnie Generale Transatlan- tique 357 �Perkins, Irzo v 779 �PhiladelphiaWarehouse Co., Sharp v, 379 Phillips Lubricator Co., Seibert Cyl- �inder Oil Cup Co 677 �Pierce, Ebret v 553 �Platt V. Matthews 280 �Portland Co., The, Atwood v 283 �Portland & O. li. Co., Mercantile �Trust Co. V 604 �Poscy V. Scoville 140 �Preston v. Walsh 316 �Providence Savings Bank v. Hunt. �ingtou, (two cases,) 871 �P. B. Wiltz & Co., New Orleans Nat. �Banking Ass'n v 330 �Putter, Matthews v 606 �Pulaski County, Cissell v 891 �Pulliam V. Pulliam 23, 53 �Pulliam, Pulliam v 23, 53 �Quintard, Brett v 741 �Ralston v. Crittenden 254 �Reinhardt, Werner v 676 �Roberts, United States v 540 �Rundel v. Life Ass'n of America 720 �Rutz v. City of St. Louis 338 �Ryan V. Lee 917 �Sandringbam,The 556 �Bchindler, United States v 647 �Schneider v. Lovell 666 �8cotia,The 684 �Scoville, Posey v 140 �Seale v. Vaiden, Hawkins & Roberts. 831 Second Nat. Bank of Paterson, New �York Silk Manufg Co. v 204 �Socor v. Tolede, P. & W. R. Co . . . . 15 Seibert Cylinder Oil Cup Co. v. Phil- lips IjubricatorCo 677 �Shiilier, Ar.derson v 266 �Sharp v.Philadelphia Warehouse Co. 379 �Sharp, Tiflt v 673 �Shepard, Macdonald v 919 �Sheridan, Whalen v 661 �Shurtlefi, Chung Yune v 239 ��� �
