8IMMS V. UOfiSB. 827 �The testîmony of Barth shows that he lived in Baltimore, and for a year or more prior to 1868 he had been dealing ■with Morse, and supplying the hôtel with liqnors, and that in November, 1868, Morse owed him a balance of $398.76 ; that prior to the fifth of November, 1868, he cashed a draft for Mrs. Morse for $625, drawn by her on her son-in-law in Massachusetts, with which money she proposed to pay a balance due on the purchase money of the property in ques- tion; that the draft came back to him protested, and he went to Annapolis to see Mrs. Morse about it; that she said to him she had expected the money from Massachusetts, but had been disappointed, and proposed to sell him the prop- erty for $2,300; that he consented to take it at that price, provided she aUowed him, as a payment on account of the purchase, the debt of $398.75 due him by her husband, together with the draft he had cashed for her; that upon these terms he made the purchase, and paid to her the bal- ance of the purchase money. �The contention of the complainants is that Barth knew that Morse had for a long time been insolvent, and knew that the property conveyed to his wife was paid for by him and conveyed to her in fraud of his creditors, and that Barth's purchase of the property was a method of securing the debt due him by Morse, and for that reason he aided Morse in conveying away the property in fraud of the bankrupt aet. �The testimony shows that Barth in November, 1869, had good reason to believe that Morse was insolvent, and had been so for some time; but there is no evidence to show that he had any knowledge that the property had not been bought by her, or that the money which had been paid on account o^ the purchase of the property in question was not Mrs. Morse's money, as she claimed. The testimony of Mrs. Morse, and of her husband and her son, tend to show that she did pay the money out of her own funds. Mrs. Morse, in her testimony, says : "I purchased the house on the Duke of Gloucester street, in Annapolis, from Mary A. Campbell and others. The deed was not put on record, because the purchase money wasnot ail paid until November, 1869. The last payment was pro- ����
