Page:History of Freedom.djvu/427

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

DÖLLINGER'S HISTORICAL WORK 383

every difficulty. People had a right to know what he, knew about the end of the sixteenth chapter of St. Mark, and the beginning of the eighth chapter of St. John, the lives of St. Patrick and the sources of Erigena, the author of the I1nitation and of the Twelve Articles, the Nag's Head and the Casket Letters. The suspense and poise of the mind, \vhich is the pride and privilege of the un- professional scholar, was forbidden him. Students could not wait for the master to complete his studies; they flocked for dry light of knowledge, for something defined and final, to their keen, grave, unemotional professor, who said sometimes more than he could be sure of, but who was not likely to abridge thought by oracular responses, or to give aphorism for argument. He accepted the necessity of the situation. A time came when everybody was invited, once a we k, to put any imaginable question from the whole of Church history, and he at once replied. If this was a stimulus to exertion during the years spent in mastering and pondering the immense materials, it served less to prOlTIote originality and care than premature certitude and the craving for quick returns. Apart from the constant duty of teaching, his knowledge might not have been so extensive, but his views would have been less decided and therefore less liable to change. As an historian, Döllinger regarded Christianity as a force more than as a doctrine, and displayed it as it expanded and became the soul of later history. It was the mission and occupation of his life to discover and to disclose ho\v this was accomplished, and to understand the history of civiIised Europe, religious and profane, mental and political, by the aid of sources which, being original and authentic, yielded certainty. In his vigorous prime, he thought that it \vould be within his powers to complete the narrative of the conquest of the world by Christ in a single massive work. The separated churches, the centri- fugal forces, were to have been treated apart, until he adopted the ampler title of a history of Christianity. We who look back upon all that the combined and divided labour of a thousand earnest, gifted, and often instructed