CONTENTS.
LETTER :: PAGE
I. Lord John Russell and Scotch Episcopacy . . . 3
II. High Churchmen and the Royal Supremacy . . . 7
III. Lord Ashley and his Meeting . . . 12
IV. National Club . . . 17
V. The Bishop of London and Mr. Bennett . . . 28
VI. The London Union on Church Matters . . . 33
VII. The Bishop of London and Mr. Bennett . . . 39
VIII. Can Convocation be Reformed . . . 42
L. Proseuché-Lord Ashley and Mr. Alford . . . 49
X. Archdeacon Sinclair and his Visitation . . . 54
XI. The Bishop of London's Reply to the Clergy of the Arch-
- deaconry of Middlesex . . . 61
XII. Mr. Bennett's Resignation . . . 70
XIII. The late Meeting for the Revival of Convocation . . . 73
XIV. The Revision of the Prayer Book . . . 79
XV. Mr. Bennett and the Bishop of London . . . 85
XVI. Lord Ashley and the Revision of the Prayer Book . . . 89
XVII. Mr. Bennett's Resignation . . . 95
XVill. The Bishop of Manchester . . . 97
XIX. The Theory of Episcopacy.-I. . . . 104
XX. The Bishop of Manchester's Rejoinder . . . 111
LTI. The Late Meeting of Convocation . . . 120
XXII. Lord John Russell and the Bishops . . . 123
XXIII. Lord Ashley in the House of Commons . . . 126
XXIV. The Theory of Episcopacy.-II. . . . 131
XXV. Marriage with a Deceased Wife's Sister . . . 137
XXVI. Papal Aggression and the Scotch Bishops . . . 141
XXVII. Parliamentary Reform and the Mummeries of Superstition . . . 144
XXVIII. Lord Stanley and Mr. Gladstone . . . 148
XXIX. Lord John Russell, Low Churchmen, and the Bishops . . . 150
