Page:LorentzGravitation1916.djvu/9

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.


(1,2) (2,3), (3,1), which do not intersect the indicatrix itself but the conjugate indicatrix, this proposition follows from a well-known theorem of Gauss in the theory of curvature of surfaces; for the other three (1,4), (2,4), (3,4), which cut the indicatrix itself, the proof can be given by direct calculation. The considerations necessary for this, and some other calculations with which we shall be concerned further on will be communicated in a later paper.

In considering the three last-mentioned extensions I have confined myself to triangles with real sides (§ 7, b).

The quotient

\frac{e}{\Delta}=K_{ab}

is now for each extension a definite number, which we may consider as a measure of the curvature of the two-dimensional extension (a, b); the sum K of the six numbers K_{ab} may be called the curvature of the field-figure at the point P in question. This quantity is the same that has been introduced by Hilbert; this results from the calculation of its value, which at the same time shows K to be independent of the special choice of the directions 1, 2, 3, 4 introduced in the beginning of this §.

The numbers K_{ab} all real and have a meaning that can be indicated without the introduction of coordinates; moreover their sum K is not changed by a deformation of the field-figure.

If now d\Omega is an element of the four-dimensional extension of the field-figure, expressed in natural measure, the part of the principal function belonging to the gravitation field is

H_{3}=\frac{i}{\varkappa}\int Kd\Omega (6)

where the integration is extended to the domain considered (§ 6) while \varkappa is the gravitation constant. H_{3} too is not changed by a deformation of the field-figure.

The factor i has been introduced in order to obtain a real value for H_3, the element d\Omega being represented in natural measure by a negative imaginary number (§ 8).


§ 10. What we have to say of the electromagnetic field must be preceded by some considerations belonging to what may be called the "vector theory" of the field-figure.

A line-element PQ, taken in a definite, direction (indicated by the order of the letters), may be called a vector. Such vectors can be compounded or decomposed by means of parallelograms or parallelepipeds. Especially, when coordinates x_{1},\dots x_{4} have been chosen,