Page:Myth, Ritual, and Religion (Volume 1).djvu/308

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.

conclusion by similar rites, in which the purpose of mystically cleansing was openly put forward. Thus Plutarch, in his essay on superstition, represents the guilty man who would be purified actually rolling in clay, confessing his misdeeds, and then sitting at home purified by the cleansing process (περιματτόμενος).[1] In another rite, the cleansing of blood-guiltiness, a similar process was practised. Orestes, after killing his mother, complains that the Eumenides do not cease to persecute him, though he has been "purified by blood of swine."[2] Apollonius says that the red hand of the murderer was dipped in the blood of swine and then washed.[3] Athenæus describes a similar unpleasant ceremony.[4] The blood of whelps was apparently used also, men being first daubed with it and then washed clean.[5] The word περιμάττουσι is again the appropriate ritual term. Such rites Plutarch calls ῥυπαραὶ ἁγνεῖαι, "filthy purifications."[6] If daubing with dirt is known to have been a feature of Greek mysteries, it meets us everywhere among savages. In O-Kee-Pa, that curiously minute account of the Mandan mysteries, Catlin writes that a portion of the frame of the initiate was "covered with clay, which the operator took from a wooden bowl, and with his hand plastered unsparingly over." The fifty young men waiting for initiation

  1. So Hermann, op. cit., p. 133.
  2. Eumenides, 273.
  3. Argonautica, iv. 693.
  4. ix. 78. Hermann, from whom the latter passages are borrowed, also quotes the evidence of a vase published by Feuerbach, Lehrbuch, p. 131, with other authorities.
  5. Plutarch, Quæst. Rom., 68.
  6. De Superstitione, chap. xii.