Page:Narrative of a survey of the intertropical and western coasts of Australia, Volume 2.djvu/572

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Botany.]
NATURAL HISTORY.
547

the vegetable Embryo,[1] in which he describes the ovulum before fecundation as having two coats; but of these, his inner coat is evidently the middle membrane of Grew, the chorion of Malpighi, or what I have termed nucleus.

In 1822, Mons. Dutrochet, unacquainted, as it would seem, with the dissertation of Professor Treviranus, published his observations on the same subject.[2] In what regards the structure of the ovulum, he essentially agrees with that author, and has equally overlooked the inner membrane.

It is remarkable that neither of these observers should have noticed the foramen in the testa. And as they do not even mention the well-known essays of MM. Turpin and Auguste de St. Hilaire on the micropyle, it may be presumed that they were not disposed to adopt the statements of these authors respecting it.

Professor Link, in his Philosophia Botanica, published in 1824, adopts the account given by Treviranus, of the coats of the ovulum before impregnation;[3] and of M. Turpin, as to the situation of the micropyle, and its being the cicatrix of a vascular cord. Yet he seems not to admit the function ascribed to it, and asserts that it is in many cases wanting.[4]


The account which I have given of the structure of the vegetable ovulum differs essentially from all those now quoted, and I am not acquainted with any other observations of importance respecting it.

Of the authors referred to, it may be remarked, that those who have most particularly attended to the ovulum ex-

  1. Entwick. des Embryo im Pflanzen-Ey.
  2. Mém. du Mus. d'Hist. Nat. tom. viii, p. 241, et seq.
  3. Elém. Philos. Bot. p. 338.
  4. Id. p. 340.