Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/146

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
A Year of Campaigning
127

commencement of civil war and revolution.[1] The Union papers teemed with articles against the heresy of nullification. As to the famous sixth resolution of the last session of the legislature, passed by a vote of 90 to 24, of which the State Rights men were making so much, some of the Unionists contended that there was no warrant for nullification in it and that three-fourths of those who voted for it would deny that they had voted for nullification or sanctioned it as a constitutional means of redress.[2] Others, however, as they reflected upon the legislature's transactions and upon the work of Congress, admitted that the outlook was gloomy.

While Joel R. Poinsett believed that the Nullification or Convention party was not as strong as had been thought, William Drayton was of the opposite view. It appeared to him that many members of the legislature who voted against the calling of a convention were not against that measure upon principle, but were merely averse to it at that time, and that the addition of their

  1. The State Rights press replied that the opposition was equally active if not so aboveboard in its work (Mercury, August 3, 1831; Messenger, December 14).
  2. Camden Journal, March 26, 1831.