Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/279

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
260
Nullification Controversy in South Carolina

many of the National Republicans. But upon second thought he agreed with Van Buren that they must neither court the Nationals nor meet their advances. Webster and Calhoun must be kept at arm's length on either side.[1]

They must be on their guard against Clay also, and with this in view as well as for the purpose of quieting South Carolina and preventing the spread of sentiment in favor of a southern convention, the tariff must be reduced in 1833 to prevent "Clay and his satellites" from having about six millions of surplus revenue to deal out for internal improvements at the long session of 1833-34, when all the surplus in the treasury would become a bribery fund for debauching the states and buying presidential votes. Indeed, Van Buren and the New York delegation in the House of Representatives might win increased popularity by having the tariff reduction come under their auspices.[2]

The combined influence of the "Triumvirs," Clay, Calhotm, and Webster, was much to be

  1. Van Buren Papers: Jackson to Van Buren, August 30, October, 23, 1832; Amos Kendall to Van Buren, November 2, 10.
  2. Van Buren Papers: Thomas H. Benton to Van Buren, December 16, 1832.