Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/333

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
314
Nullification Controversy in South Carolina

law of 1824. One statement was just as absurd as the other, to the Union men.[1]

When it came time for the Charleston city elections in September, the Union men refused to nominate a ticket, because, they said, they wished no longer to continue the excitement and antagonism. Just before the election, however, an independent ticket appeared, which made a fair showing, but was not able to defeat any part of the State Rights ticket. The State Rights men accused the Union men of thus trying, under a disguise, to get into control. The Union party, as such, denied the charge, and said that what few Union men voted the Independent ticket, which was promoted by seceders from the Nullification party, did so as individuals and without party concert.[2]

During this year there came a congressional election, delayed from the year before. In the last Congress the Union men had had three of the nine members of the House of Representatives. As a result of the election in September of 1833 they had only one, James Blair. In a few dis--

  1. Patriot, August 31, 1833; Niles' Register, September 7.
  2. Mercury, August 23, 30, September 4, 1833; Courier, September 4.