Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/373

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
354
Nullification Controversy in South Carolina

cessive legislatures could adopt amendments, the intent was to have two-thirds of the voters. The State Rights men ridiculed this claim. Suppose they said, that the result of the late election had

Map X. — Popular vote for legislature, 1834

proved that two-thirds of the voters were in favor of the amendment, while more than one-third of the representatives elected were opposed to it, would the Union party have agreed that the amendment should be made? It would not do for the Union party to insist that either the voters or their representatives were to be regarded just as might