The grounds of Mr. Y——'s decision, were—
1st. That the man was not legally in custody.
2nd. That he was not within reasonable distance of my house.
3rd. That he did not understand the English language.
On receiving this, I felt quite relieved, and thought that a clear decision upon these three points would be very cheaply purchased by an expenditure of fifty pounds.
However, on mentioning the subject to several of my personal friends, who were themselves high in the profession of the law, I was destined to be grievously disappointed. I was informed that the Court of Queen's Bench would not decide upon any one of the questions, but would decide generally that the magistrate's decision was right or was wrong, without giving me the least intimation on which of the grounds it rested.
I now perceived the dodge that had been practised upon me, and I felt compelled to admit that Mr. Y—— was a clever fellow. A regard for truth, however, forbids me to extend the application of this observation to anybody else concerned in this matter.
I have spared neither expense nor personal trouble in endeavouring to put a stop to this nuisance. During one twelve-month those expenses amounted, within a few shillings, to one hundred and four pounds. I was not, however, the only sufferer; that amount would otherwise have been expended in giving a year's employment to a skilled workman, whose wages are about two pounds a week.
I shall now give one illustration from my own experience of the utterly imperfect state of the law for suppressing the nuisance of street music:—
On Monday, the 29th of February, in the present year, at 3 p.m., in the midst of a thick fog, a brass band struck up
