xv. Teme. FiliSts. 8' rain minitiers, to who/} valid and eflleadou$ prayers ?ve may t?iouflyfu?oi?o!?_the Reftoration was in a great mealare owing. It fills out very luckily for this 1oral preacher, that all his initantes agree with. �ome- thing nosy.a-days. We all know that there Is now in tee world a ?t of t?ng!i.? hiehops, prielts, and deacons, behind the curtain, who are perpetuatinl? for us this invaluable bl.e?n of a regular u?)nterru?5 tedfutee?on 5 and putting up valid prayers for anb- ther R?atto?; but that our ?tho&x pr?eher the? in his eye, would ? avaiu &urch, ? re?ealing the la?s ma& for it? and allowing a Yolerafion to all per, ns, ?ko them?lves Protefiants; the' under that name ?ere inclMed, ?ho did not believe the reefired trines ol ethe Trinity. Where this was aim'd, is ve_ri/' plain, flnce in �rom?d's days feveral.l?_r�ons, whi? did not believe the receiwt do6trines of'the Trinity, were �o fir from being, toleratM, that they were profecuted with the utmof[ rigour. I!. By our injufii?e to the Kmo, which, did he, conrifled in keeping hi.m out of his rightful and here. ditary dominiom i ?ohtek they did upon there prind- Fir/}, Vox l?Ot?uli eft v0x Dti; which has fmce ,.been ?ged by the eburth as m argument for hered, tury right. Secondly', $alus pol?ul ! e? fieprema lex. ?hiuily, Hereditary rtgbt u,?t be it a?de. Which rome White-.boobies have thought to be the and not principles of the Revolution, of the Oliveria ufurl?ationi but what cannot ignorance and whiggila fee?- lgay, fikl he, many fithe Xlng5 ?iendt them?}Iv?
�
