Terr.Filius. N �ll? My modefly'will not fuffer me to believe that .37m defigu'd me lb great a coml?liment, as feems. tacit/), to refult to me from your late condun, ?i?. that fiRm'aucuus having taken his revenge of' Hosza and Dr. Bzsvx.?v, he could find no other writer fo worthy to fall his fierifice, as (fNu'e.. my blu?s!) poor Whatever was your inducement. to ufe me rigorous a manner,.I. am lure you merit the. thanks of the univerj7ties, which, I hope, they will not for. get to return you in the moft j?lemn mannev? for' .?our noble defence of' tlto? ?ntient bodies, again?. the revengeful cavils ?nd afperfions of ,one ext?!l',t. as you alledge, from Oxford, for j?andalous beha- I cannot, by the w?y, forbear wontiring, the fage/?um-^u. cuo?"fboukt fpeak with contempt of any author upon that account: ?xpu?on?is moll. ?inly a v?y ?amous thing; but will fly t? a man, who has ?en'bmnd? in this man- n&, is for ever ?erwrds inc?bteoffpeakjng trutb,. or writing e?mon ?n? e Surely, ?6ple a? not the w?fe for eom?m? lbr my pat, I v?ly ?ieve, t?t even a ?n, who h? fl? in-t?, (which I think romething more ? amous than . t?on) may till continue a ?e?t?le. ?ter, and an h?efi m? ? my, I my f? kn? t? men, who ?ve Mth ?ac'd ?at woo&n e?n?ee, a? yet are? at this ?me, ?ought the Fo?ere? ?fons to ? re- taimd m ?e ? of ?e Church, t? C?gy, ?d ?trfftits. But to fete; you n? ?, at ? d?bt that this burning and fhining. light, thi? brJghtq? earnest of the rJnivtrj?ty, will be very grateful to you � for your fervic? to .him, whatever the may be it fell: for as bright an orna?.ent.as he' ?, you, Sir, are the firit man, who has. appeared p. ub- !ickly m his defence a?.'. ?e mi?eprffmtauons
�
