4 Y'erre. Filius. N* xxxz. For, it is a maxim astrueasitiscommon, o mttny ?nen, ? ma? ?.?d? i but a?ong? ? th? numbsleft di?mt options of minkrod, there ?s never, at any one time, b?t one ot thole qpinions which is -?'d onho&x; ? theefo? 7on ?ve your ?ancy the rdns, =d let you? 9? judgmmt determine yo? o?nions, what inM?:e ?d{ ?s it, wh?er you ha? ? ? hit u?n ?t ?gle, individual opinion, which ' at ?t 'eu? =its of time, N vo e, =d w?& it is thefore y?r mt?e? to ?e } But ?5 wit? aa yo? dili?nce and finc?ty, you ?ould m? the, r?ra ?is, t?hppy ?b?nig o?inion, ? f?ewel to fll ?our ?tux? ?mf?s, to your ?, your t?utation and g?d ?ame for et? a?- ?i I m?n if Ion ?e fo w?k, ?d Fo much b?ott? with ?uafion, ? to thNk it 1o? du? to Your oily ?fe wiy ?=e?re ? to a? flong with lou confd? tb?n?s bl?nthes, r=dy to r?- ' ' ?, t?t ?ou pl? to '?amp upon c?ve any ?mpr?ou . them; for I would not ?ve } ou ad0?t ?y ?rti?- 1? fy?em, howev= ?p? a?d prevailing it may f? ? ? at grffmt, ?ufe tt may ?ter, md then w? p?ve h? to you; for, as much a? they ? of ?eddinefi md immu?abili? of principle? at OxFo?tt?, evexy body knows that Po?,?_?t?t was for orthodox many ?es the teS?on there; t?t ?rotefian- film (with much di?l?, and forely a?in? their ?s) fucc?ed iti that, not long they were Rgoa ?mo? ? Wrens, and now =lmoR all To?s, and, for ought we 'kno? wi? e? long be Wa? n.? Nev= t?ore ?lain yo? opini?s, but t o? declamfiom'?, that you are cburt?en, and t?t ?oa ?e aa fie church believes. ?o5 ?m?, you ?ve fubf?'d the thirty antflesi but ne?_ ?enture to explain the ?n?, in which you fubf?b d them; Nou? there are va- t?a f?s i fo m?, ?d?, t?t f?ce two men
�
