Page:The European Concert in the Eastern Question.djvu/257

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA.
241

which had been laid before the Conference of Constantinople in 1876[1], subject to modifications to be agreed upon by Turkey, Russia, and Austria. The Treaty of Berlin provided a more drastic remedy for the grievances of these provinces, by arranging that they should be 'occupied and administered' by Austria[2]. One incidental result of this arrangement was to put an end to the controversy, long carried on between the Porte and Austria, as to the right of the former to communicate freely from the sea with the Herzegovina, through the two enclaves of that province, Klek and Sutorina, which jut out into Dalmatia[3].

For the subsequent history of these districts, see the note to Article 25 of the Treaty of Berlin.

Topics XIII-XVII. The remaining topics, XIII-XVII, are probably explained in sufficient detail in the notes to the relative articles of the Treaty of Berlin, together with, in the case of XV, the notes to the Convention of 1881[4].



TEXTS.

No. I.

1856, 30th March. General Treaty between Her Majesty, the Emperor of Austria, the Emperor of the French, the King of Prussia, the Emperor of Russia, the

  1. See Parl. Papers, 1877, Turkey, No. 2, p. 160.
  2. Art. 25.
  3. These two enclaves belonged to the Porte from 1597 to 1797, and in 1815 were restored to it by Austria, which however objected, especially in 1852 and 1876, to Ottoman troops being sent through them into the Herzegovina, declaring that the coast water on which they abut is Austrian. See the Treaty of Paris of 30th May, 1814; the Treaty of Vienna, of 9th June, 1815, Art. 93; and, for the correspondence in 1853, N.R.G. xv, 471; in 1876, Parl. Papers, Turkey, No. 1, p. 38.
  4. Supra, p. 60.