364 RECORDS OF THE FEDEP, AL CONVENTION Tuesday MADISON A?gu?t zx Md ay. Va. ay (Genl W. & J. M. no.)uu N. C. ay. S.C. ay. Geo-- ay. [Ayes -- 7; noes -- 4-] Mr L--Martin, proposed to vary the sect: 4. art VII so as to allow a prohibition or tax on the importation of slaves. us I. As five slaves are to be counted as 3 free men in the appor- tionment of Representatives; such a clause wd. leave an encouragement to this trafic. z slaves weakened one part of the Union which the other parts were bound to protect: the privilege of importing them was therefore unreasonable- 3. it was inconsistent with the principles of the revolution and dishonorable to the American character to have such a feature in the Constitution. Mr Rutlidge did not see how the importation of slaves could be encouraged by this section. He was not apprehen- sive of insurrections and would readily exempt the other States from 34 (the obligation to protect the Southern against them.). -- Religion & humanity had nothing to do with this question- Interest alone is the governing principle with Nations 4 The true question at present is whether the Southn. States shall or shall not be parties to the Union. If the Northern States consult tl?eir interest, they will not oppose the increase of Slaves which will increase the commodities of which they will become the carriers. Mr. Elseworth was for leaving the clause as it stands. let every State import what it pleases. The morality or wisdom of slavery are considerations belonging to the States them- selves- What enriches a part enriches the whole, and the States are the best judges of their particular interest. The old confederation had not meddled with this point, and he did not see any greater necessity for bringing it within the policy of the new one: Mr Pinkney. South Carolina can never receive the plan if it prohibits the slave trade. In every proposed extension of the powers of Congress, that State has expressly & watch- fully excepted that of meddling with the importation of negroes. ? See Appendix A, CXXXIV. ? Upon this question see further, references under August z2, note 2, and August note 7. ? Crossed out "being protected ag?t. them".
�
