great plan of compromise between the jarring and contending interests of the great and small States. …
Through the whole course of this discussion great art has been used by some of the most zealous advocates of the measure, to divert us from the real ground of distinction upon which it rests, and to lull into a fatal repose the jealousies of the small States for their rights and sovereignty. A remark of the honorable gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Smith) tending to that object, ought not to escape animadversion. He averred that no law could be found in our statute book that was produced by a combination of States, and hence inferred that no such combination ought to be apprehended. The fact admitted, said Mr. D., and what does it prove? Not what the gentleman from Maryland would infer; not what he ought to prove, before the assertion and the argument can be worth anything to him on this occasion; not that such combination may not be feared if you alter the Constitution, but that it is impracticable as it now stands. The refined process established for electing a President was calculated to guard against that very danger, but if altered and destroyed, we shall soon be subject to that evil. Why is it, sir, that none of our laws are the result of any combination of States? The reason is to be found in the checks provided against it in the Constitution. Any project founded upon a coalition of the small states, originating as it must in the Senate, would be checked in the House of Representatives; and, on the other hand, any one resulting from any concert among the great States in the other branch, would and must be defeated in this. But if these wholesome checks could be done away, where could be found a security against so great a temptation? I thank God that the Convention were so enlightened as to place the equality of States in the Senate beyond the reach of amendment. …
Mr. Pickering … believed that one of the
most embarrassing questions before the General Convention, respected
the choice of the chief Executive officer. He had been informed by a
member of that convention, the gentleman from Georgia on his left, (Mr.
Baldwin), that it had been proposed and concluded that the President of
the United States should be elected by Congress for seven years, and be
ever after ineligible to that office; but that late in their session
the present complex mode of electing the President and Vice President
was proposed; that the mode was perfectly novel, and therefore
occasioned a pause; but when explained and fully considered was
universally admired, and viewed as the most pleasing feature in the
Constitution. …
Mr. Butler … Whatever may be the
sentiments or wishes of the
