Page:The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 Volume 3.djvu/84

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.


[Endorsed:]

No 8.

Letter from Jonas Phillips a Jew, dated Sept. 7. 1787.

to the President & Members of the Convention


CV. Jonathan Dayton to Elias Dayton.[1]

Philadelphia, Sept. 9, 1787.

We have happily so far finished our business, as to be employed in giving it its last polish and preparing it for the public inspection. This, I conclude, may be done in three or four days, at which time the public curiosity and our desire of returning to our respective homes, will equally be gratified.


CVI. Joseph Jones to James Madison.[2]

13 September, 1787.

The continuance of your session and some stories I have heard since my return and on my visit to Alexandria, make me apprehensive there is not that unanimity in your councils I hoped for and had been taught to believe. From whence it originated I know not, but it is whispered here, there is great disagreement among the gentlemen of our delegation, that the general and yourself on a very important question were together, Mr. M—n alone and singular in his opinion and the other two gentlemen holding different sentiments. I asked what was the question in dispute, and was answered that it respected either the defect in constituting the Convention as not proceeding immediately from the people, or the referring the proceedings of the body to the people for ultimate decision and confirmation. My informant also assured me the fact might be relied on as it came, as he expressed it, from the fountain head. I took the liberty to express my disbelief of the fact and that from the circumstances related it was very improbable and unworthy attention. I mention this matter for want of something else to write to you, and more especially as it respects our delegation in particular.


CVII. Sydney to Lord Dorchester.[3]

Whitehall, 14 Sept., 1787.

The report of an intention on the part of America to apply for a sovereign of the house of Hanover[4] has been circulated here; and

  1. Jameson, Studies in the History of the Federal Convention in Annual Report of the American Historical Association, for 1902, p. 100.
  2. Massachusetts Historical Society, Proceedings, 2d Series XVII, 474–475.
  3. Bancroft, History of the Constitution of the United States, II, 441.
  4. See XCII above.