Page:Totem and Taboo (1919).djvu/61

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
THE AMBIVALENCE OF EMOTION
49

without.[1] The prohibition was accepted because it was supported by strong inner forces;[2] it proved to be stronger than the impulse which wanted to manifest itself through this act of touching. But due to the primitive psychic constitution of the child this prohibition did not succeed in abolishing the impulse. Its only success lay in repressing the impulse (the pleasure of touching) and banishing it into the unconscious. Both the prohibition and the impulse remained; the impulse because it had only been repressed and not abolished, the prohibition, because if it had ceased the impulse would have broken through into consciousness and would have been carried out. An unsolved situation, a psychic fixation, had thus been created and now everything else emanated from the continued conflict between prohibition and impulse.

The main characteristic of the psychic constellation which has thus undergone fixation lies in what one might call the ambivalent behavior[3] of the individual to the object, or rather to an action regarding it. The individual constantly wants to carry out this action (the act of touching), he sees in it the highest pleasure, but he

  1. Both the pleasure and the prohibition referred to touching one’s own genitals.
  2. The relation to beloved persons who impose the prohibition.
  3. To use an excellent term coined by Bleuler.