Page:Totem and Taboo (1919).djvu/81

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
THE AMBIVALENCE OF EMOTION
69

society really conveys a good idea of the “taboo” of savages.[1]

The current explanation of all these rules of reconciliation, restriction, expiation and purification, combines two principles, namely, the extension of the taboo of the dead to everything that has come into contact with him, and the fear of the spirit of the slain. In what combination these two elements are to explain the ceremonial, whether they are to be considered as of equal value or whether one of them is primary and the other secondary, and which one, is nowhere stated, nor would this be an easy matter to decide. In contradistinction to all this we emphasize the unity which our interpretation gains by deducing all these rules from the ambivalence of the emotion of savages towards their enemies.


b) the taboo of rulers

The behavior of primitive races towards their chiefs, kings, and priests, is controlled by two principles which seem rather to supplement than to contradict each other. They must both be guarded and be guarded against.[2]

Both objects are accomplished through innumerable rules of taboo. Why one must guard

  1. For these examples see Frazer, “Taboo,” p. 165-170, “Manslayers Tabooed.”
  2. Frazer, “Taboo,” p. 132. “He must not only be guarded, he must also be guarded against.”