Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 113 Part 1.djvu/301

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

PUBLIC LAW 10&-53—AUG. 17, 1999 113 STAT. 277 (19) BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GEORGIA.—The project for navigation, Brunswick Harbor, Georgia: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a total cost of $50,717,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $32,966,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,751,000. (20) BEARGRASS CREEK, KENTUCKY.— The project for flood control, Beargrass Creek, Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated May 12, 1998, at a total cost of $11,171,300, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,261,500 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,909,800. (21) AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA, EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH WATERSHED. —The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 23, 1996, at a total cost of $112,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $73,400,000 and an estimated non-Federed cost of $39,500,000. (22) BALTIMORE HARBOR ANCHORAGES AND CHANNELS, MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA, — (A) IN GENERAL.— The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor Anchorages and Channels, Maryland and Virginia, Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 8, 1998, at a total cost of $28,426,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $18,994,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,432,000. (B) CREDIT OR REIMBURSEMENT. —I f a project cooperation agreement is entered into, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit toward, or reimbursement of, the Federal share of project costs for construction work performed by the non-Federal interest before execution of the project cooperation agreement if the Secretary finds the work to be integral to the project. (C) STUDY OF MODIFICATIONS. —During the preconstruction engineering and design phase of the project, the Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of undertaking further modifications to the Dundalk Marine Terminal access chguinels, consisting of— (i) deepening and widening the Dundalk access channels to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 500 feet; (ii) widening the flares of the access channels; and (iii) providing a new flare on the west side of the entrgtnce to the east access channel. (D) REPORT. — Deadline. (i) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2000, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the study under subparagraph (C). (ii) CONTENTS.— The report shall include a determination of— (I) the feasibility of performing the project modifications described in subparagraph (C); and (II) the appropriateness of crediting or reimbursing the Federal share of the cost of the work performed by the non-Federal interest on the project modifications.