PUBLIC LAW 106-53—AUG. 17, 1999 113 STAT. 311 fish lift at St. Stephen, South Carolina, including performgince of studies to assess the efficacy of the fish lift. (b) CONTENTS OF AGREEMENT.— The agreement under subsection (a) shall specify— (1) the terms and conditions under which payment will be made; and (2) the rights of, and remedies avgiilable to, the Federal Government to recover all or a portion of the payment if the State suspends or terminates operation of the fish lift or fails to operate the fish lift in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary. (c) MAINTENANCE. —Maintenance of the fish lift shall remain a Federal responsibility. SEC. 354. CLEAR CREEK, TEXAS. Section 575 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3789) is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by inserting "or nonstructural actions" after "flood control works constructed"; and (B) by inserting "or nonstructural actions" after "construction of the project"; and (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (2), by striking "and" at the end; (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and inserting "; and"; and (C) by adding at the end the following: "(4) the project for flood control, Clear Creek, Texas, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 742).". SEC. 355. CYPRESS CREEK, TEXAS. (a) IN GENERAL.— The project for flood control, C3rpress Creek, Texas, authorized by section 3(a)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014), is modified to authorize the Secretary to csury out a nonstructural flood control project at a total cost of $5,000,000. (b) REIMBURSEMENT FOR WORK. —The Secretary may reimburse the non-Federal interest for the Cypress Creek project for work done by the non-Federal interest on the nonstructural flood control project in an sunount equal to the estimate of the Federal share, without interest, of the cost of the work— (1) if, after authorization and before initiation of construction of the nonstructural project, the Secretary approves the plans for construction of the nonstructural project by the non- Federal interest; and (2) if the Secretary finds, after a review of studies and design documents prepeu'ed to carry out the nonstructured project, that construction of the nonstructural project is economically justified and environmentally acceptable. SEC. 356. DALXAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, DALLAS, TEXAS. The project for flood control, Dallas Floodway Extension, Dallas, Texas, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1091) and modified by section 351 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3724), is fiuther modified to add environmental restoration and recreation as project purposes.
�
