Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 119.djvu/2003

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

[119 STAT. 1985]
PUBLIC LAW 109-000—MMMM. DD, 2005
[119 STAT. 1985]

PUBLIC LAW 109–60—AUG. 11, 2005

119 STAT. 1985

‘‘(B) ADDITIONAL CATEGORIES OF EXCLUSION.—If the Secretary determines under subparagraph (A) that a substantial negative impact has been demonstrated with regard to one or more of the categories of patients described in such subparagraph, the Secretary shall identify additional appropriate categories of exclusion from reporting as authorized under subsection (d)(2)(C). ‘‘(2) PROGRESS REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are first appropriated under this section, the Secretary shall— ‘‘(A) complete a study that— ‘‘(i) determines the progress of States in establishing and implementing controlled substance monitoring programs under this section; ‘‘(ii) provides an analysis of the extent to which the operation of controlled substance monitoring programs have reduced inappropriate use, abuse, or diversion of controlled substances or affected patient access to appropriate pain care in States operating such programs; ‘‘(iii) determines the progress of States in achieving interoperability between controlled substance monitoring programs, including an assessment of technical and legal barriers to such activities and recommendations for addressing these barriers; ‘‘(iv) determines the feasibility of implementing a real-time electronic controlled substance monitoring program, including the costs associated with establishing such a program; ‘‘(v) provides an analysis of the privacy protections in place for the information reported to the controlled substance monitoring program in each State receiving a grant for the establishment or operation of such program, and any recommendations for additional requirements for protection of this information; ‘‘(vi) determines the feasibility of implementing technological alternatives to centralized data storage, such as peer-to-peer file sharing or data pointer systems, in controlled substance monitoring programs and the potential for such alternatives to enhance the privacy and security of individually identifiable data; and ‘‘(vii) evaluates the penalties that States have enacted for the unauthorized use and disclosure of information maintained in the controlled substance monitoring program, and reports on the criteria used by the Secretary to determine whether such penalties qualify as appropriate pursuant to this section; and ‘‘(B) submit a report to the Congress on the results of the study. ‘‘(k) PREFERENCE.—Beginning 3 years after the date on which funds are first appropriated to carry out this section, the Secretary, in awarding any competitive grant that is related to drug abuse (as determined by the Secretary) and for which only States are eligible to apply, shall give preference to any State with an application approved under this section. The Secretary shall have the discretion to apply such preference to States with existing controlled substance monitoring programs that meet minimum requirements

VerDate 14-DEC-2004

13:51 Oct 26, 2006

Jkt 039194

PO 00002

Frm 00842

Fmt 6580

Sfmt 6581

E:\PUBLAW\PUBL002.119

Effective date.

APPS06

PsN: PUBL002