Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 74.djvu/522

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search
This page needs to be proofread.
[74 Stat. 482]
[74 Stat. 482]
PUBLIC LAW 86-000—MMMM. DD, 1960

PUBLIC LAW 86-645-JULY 14, 1960

482 Kentucky.

68 Stat. 1248,

Mi s s i s s i p p i River.

Minnesota. Mi c h i g a n and Wisconsin.

Minnesota Wisconsin.

Michigan.

Illinois diana.

and In-

Ohio.

Pennsylvania.

[74

STAT,

I n addition to previous authorizations,-there is hereby authorized the completion of the Barkley P a m project in Kentucky, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1954, at an estimated additional cost of $146,000,000: Provided, That the Chief of Engineers is hereby authorized to relocate the Illinois Central Railroad, as required by the construction of said project, in such manner as to eliminate and prevent interference with and disturbance of municipal and private facilities in Lyon County, Kentucky, not otherwise affected by the construction of the project, substantially in accordance with alinement " D " shown on the plans on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers; Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota at I)ubuque, Iowa: House Document;Numbered 56, Eightysixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $38,000; Red Wing Harbor, Minnesota: House Document Numbered 32, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $170,400; Menominee Harbor and River, Michigan and Wisconsin: House Document Numbered 113, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $715,000; Milwaukee Harbor, Wisconsin: House Document Numbered 285, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $38,000; Kewaunee Harbor, Wisconsin: Senate Document Numbered 19, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $81,900; Two Harbors, Minnesota: House Document Numbered 146, Eightysixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $162,000; Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota and Wisconsin: House Document Numbered 150, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $2,364,000; Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota and Wisconsin: House Document Numbered 196, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $2,513,000; Ashland Harbor, Wisconsin: House Document Numbered 165, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,495,000; Presque Isle Harbor, Michigan: House Document Numbered 145, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $215,300; Marquette Harbor, Michigan: House Document Numbered 154, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $236,000; Manistee Harbor, Michigan: House Document Numbered 358, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,735,000,; Detroit River, Trenton Channel, Michigan: House Document Numbered 319, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $8,570,000; Calumet Harbor, Illinois and Indiana: House Document Numbered 149, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $5,240,000; Indiana Harbor, Indiana: House Document Numbered 195, Eightysixth Congress, at an esjtimated cost of $974,000; Toledo Harbor, Ohio: House Document Numbered 153, Eightysixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $14,684,000; Sandusky Harbor, Ohio: House Document Numbered 144, Eightysixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $5,800,000; Cleveland Harbor, Ohio: House Document Numbered 152, Eightysixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $2,486,000; Lorain Harbor, Ohio: House Document Numbered 166, Eightysixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $19,323,000; Fairport Harbor, Ohio: House Document Numbered 347, Eightysixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $2,768,000; Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio: House Document Numbered 148, Eightysixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $4,077,000; Erie Harbor, Pennsylvania: House Document Numbered 199, Eighty-sixth Congress, at an estimated cost of $1,729,000;