Page:Untangling the Web.pdf/22

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

DOCID: 4046925

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

search utilities, toolbars integrated into the browser, and application programming interfaces (APIs) for use by individual developers.

If 2004 was the year of the new search engine and 2005 the year of tailored search, 2006 seems to have been the first year of Web 2.0. Interactive, participatory Internet activities such as blogging, podcasts, online video sharing, and wikis dominated the discourse.

Podcasting finally came into its own last year. Podcasting is recording and broadcasting any non-musical information—be it news, radio shows, sporting events, audio tours, or personal opinions—usually in MP3 format for playback using a digital audio player. Many websites now serve as directories to help users find podcasts of every variety anywhere in the world. Podcasting has caught on because it is easy, inexpensive, mobile, flexible, and powerful. Yahoo got out in front of the podcasting trend with its new Podcasts Search site after a study the search giant published with Ipsos Insight, which disclosed that most of the people who are using RSS do so without even knowing it.[1] RSS, which either stands for Rich Site Summary or Really Simple Syndication, is an XML format for news and content syndication. News aggregators are programs designed to read RSS formatted content, which is very popular in the blogging community. Many if not most blogs make their content available in RSS.

Although there is no agreed upon definition of what Web 2.0 means, in general terms most people believe it involves at a minimum users collaborating to share information online, i.e., an interactive, participatory web in contrast to what is now being called the static web (or Web 1.0). I think the Wikipedia article on Web 2.0 sums the current state of affairs up nicely when it says "To some extent Web 2.0 is a buzzword, incorporating whatever is newly popular on the Web (such as tags and podcasts), and its meaning is still in flux.[2]

Another important aspect of Web 2.0 is that it organizes information differently from traditional web and other news and knowledge models. So reports a Time article on the frontiers of search in its 5 September 2005 issue. There is good reason to believe this claim, given a major investment firm's assessment that "by 2010, search-engine advertising will be a $22 billion industry worldwide, up from an estimated $8 billion today."[3]

One casualty of Web 2.0 appears to be directories. Directories are hierarchical guides to a subset of what are presumably the best, most relevant (or at least most popular) websites on a specific topic. Yahoo was always the king of directories, but


  1. Yahoo! and Ipsos Insight, "RSS: Crossing into the Mainstream," October 2005 [PDF], <http://publisher.yahoo.com/rss/RSS_whitePaper1004.pdf> (14 November 2006).
  2. "Web 2.0," Wikipedia, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0> (15 November 2006).
  3. McCarthy.
14
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY