Sterling v. Constantin

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Sterling v. Constantin
by Charles Evans Hughes
Syllabus
883354Sterling v. Constantin — SyllabusCharles Evans Hughes
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

287 U.S. 378

Sterling  v.  Constantin

 Argued: Nov. 15-16, 1932. --- Decided: Dec 12, 1932

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas.

[Syllabus from pages 378-380 intentionally omitted]

Appeal from the interlocutory injunction order dismissed, and judgment affirmed on appeal from the final judgment.

Messrs. E. F. Smith, of Austin, Tex., and Dan Moody, of Austin, Tex., for appellants.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 380-385 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Joseph W. Bailey, Jr., and Luther Nickels, both of Dallas, Tex., for appellees.

Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse