Tinker v. Des Moines School District/Dissent Harlan
From Wikisource
| ←United States Supreme Court | Dissent Harlan by Dissenting Opinion |
| Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District... resulted in a decision defining the constitutional rights of students in U.S. public schools. It is considered one of the Court's more controversial decisions of the 1960s regarding freedom of speech. The Tinker test is still used by courts today to determine whether a school's disciplinary actions violate students' First Amendment rights.— Excerpted from Tinker v. Des Moines on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. |
| Court Documents |
|---|
| Case Syllabus |
| Opinion of the Court |
| Concurring Opinions Stewart White |
| Dissenting Opinions Black Harlan |
 |
| Linked cases: 413 U.S. 15 478 U.S. 675 484 U.S. 260 |
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting.
I certainly agree that state public school authorities in the discharge of their responsibilities are not wholly exempt from the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment respecting the freedoms of expression and association. At the same time I am reluctant to believe that there is any disagreement between the majority and myself on the proposition that school officials should be accorded the widest authority in maintaining discipline and good order in their institutions. To translate that proposition into a workable constitutional rule, I would, in cases like this, cast upon those complaining the burden of showing that a particular school measure was motivated by other than legitimate school concerns--for example, a desire to prohibit the expression of an unpopular point of view, while permitting expression of the dominant opinion.
Finding nothing in this record which impugns the good faith of respondents in promulgating the armband regulation, I would affirm the judgment below.
